The web is being restructured, and search is changing faster than most practitioners can track. The SERPs exists to examine what's actually happening, with iGaming as the primary vertical and the wider online ecosystem as context.
Written by Charlotte Camilleri, an SEO consultant and tech writer with 12 years in the deep end. More about the author →
I have spent my career in iGaming SEO, on both the operator and the affiliate side. It is one of the most competitive and least forgiving corners of search: the margins are big enough that every tactic gets pushed to its limit and stress-tested to destruction. It is also one of the best places to learn how search really works, because nothing polite survives there for long.
My interest has never stopped at rankings, though. I am drawn to technology and AI more broadly, and to the digital ecosystem as a whole: how it is built, who controls it, and where it is heading. The SERPs is where I write about all of it, moving between the specifics of iGaming search and the wider forces reshaping how information is found, funded, and trusted online.
What holds my attention is rarely the tactic itself. It is the structure underneath it. So a good deal of the writing here takes the philosophical and psychological angle: the incentives that drive these systems, the way they shape what we see and believe, and what all of it means for the people living and working inside them.
AI search doesn't just filter what we find. It filters out the conditions under which we encounter difference. One voice. One synthesis. One answer. Kierkegaard called this the crowd. We built infrastructure for it.
Read articleGoogle's I/O 2026 redesign didn't disrupt the open web's economic model. It extracted the final value from it. What happens to the information layer when the financial reason to maintain it disappears?
I've been documenting the mechanics of fragmentation without calling it that. In May 2026, the Vatican named it. What we've built as infrastructure for connection is now the apparatus for division.
In 1975 a Bank of England economist described exactly what would happen to SEO. Every signal Google uses gets gamed until it stops working. That is not a flaw in the system. It is the system.
The newspaper partnership model worked. Affiliates rented domain authority from publishers, ranked for competitive iGaming keywords, and collected commissions. Then Google changed the rules. Here is what actually happened, and who paid for it.
Zero-click search is at 60% and rising. AI Overviews appear on 13% of all queries. And users are appending "reddit" to their searches because they do not trust the polished answer anymore. We have seen this before.
Fifteen years of research failed to find the filter bubble Eli Pariser warned about. Then you searched for it, got one answer from an invisible source selection, and called it settled.
The writing is the point of this site. But if you want this thinking applied to your own search problem (strategy, AI content systems, or a second pair of expert eyes), that's the day job.
Work With Me